SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 51998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
ABDULLA HAJI – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.K.AJITH KUMAR, SMT.AISWARYA RAMESAN, SMT.REMYA VARMA N.K
For the Respondents: ADV.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 20th day of November, 2025 Ext.P2 is the representation preferred by the petitioner seeking the benefit of a One-Time Settlement Scheme in connection with the loan availed by the petitioner from the respondent Bank. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider the same in accordance with law.

2. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent/Bank to consider Ext.P2 in accordance with law expeditiously, at any rate within a period of ten days from the production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent, for compliance.

The Writ Petition (Civil) is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top