Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
ABDULLA HAJI – Appellant
Versus
CANARA BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43372 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks loan consideration. (Para 1) |
| 2. bank directed to act on the petitioner's request. (Para 2) |
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 20th day of November, 2025 Ext.P2 is the representation preferred by the petitioner seeking the benefit of a One-Time Settlement Scheme in connection with the loan availed by the petitioner from the respondent Bank. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to consider the same in accordance with law.
2. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent/Bank to consider Ext.P2 in accordance with law expeditiously, at any rate within a period of ten days from the production of a copy of this judgment. Petitioner will produce a copy of the judgment before the respondent, for compliance.
The Writ Petition (Civil) is disposed of as above.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
