SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
SULFITHAMISRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.BABY THOMAS, SRI.INDRAJITH S KAIMAL, SMT.AISWARYARAJ
For the Respondents: SMT. MAYA.M.N., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SHRI.GEORGE T.J, SHRI.JOHNY GEORGE, SMT.ALICIA JOSE

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Crl.M.C. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

C. PRATHEEP KUMAR JUDGE SKP APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5762/2024 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES:

ANNEXURE A FIR BEARING NO. 667/2024 DATED

05.06.2024B OF PALARIVATTOM POLICE ANNEXURE B A TRUE COPY OF THE AFFIDAVIT FILED THE

3RD (DE FACTO COMPLAINANT) DATED

07.06.2024 ANNEXURE C A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION 41A OF THE CR.P.C. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION DATED 13.06.2024.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top