IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUTHUGOUNDER M. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused seeks quashing of fir based on dispute settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel indicates no objection to quashing from all parties. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirms suitability of invoking inherent jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1645 of
2020 registered by the Sakthikulangara Police Station, Kollam, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 428 of the Criminal Procedure Code , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, who has executed Annexure-2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The 3rd respondent has no subsisting grievance and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.