SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. Dias, J
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.JERIL BABU
For the Respondents: SRI.T.D.SUSMITH KUMAR

O R D E R

The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.26 of 2020 registered by the Mavoor Police Station alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 326 and 506(ii) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 3rd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that during the pendency of the Crl.M.C., the 1st petitioner died and the case against the 2nd petitioner has already been quashed as per the order dated 24.03.2023 in Crl.M.C.No.1005 of 2023. However, the dispute between the 3rd petitioner and the 3rd respondent has been amicably settled.

5. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of this Court to q

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top