Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. Dias, J
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and allegations. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioners invoked inherent jurisdiction citing settlement. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. public prosecutor's updates on case status. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's standards for quashing proceedings. (Para 5) |
| 5. final decision to quash based on findings. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.26 of 2020 registered by the Mavoor Police Station alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 326 and 506(ii) read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 3rd respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that during the pendency of the Crl.M.C., the 1st
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
