SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
VISHNU O – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.M.H.HANIS, SMT.T.N.LEKSHMI SHANKAR, SMT.NANCY MOL P., SHRI.ANANDHU P.C., SMT.NEETHU.G.NADH, SMT.RIA ELIZABETH T.J., SHRI.SAHAD M. HANIS
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.A.MUJEEB

O R D E R

The learned Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks liberty to withdrawn this Crl.M.C., without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court.

Recording the above submission, by reserving the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Trial Court, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top