Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
1 SIDDIK, AGED 34 YEARS S/O SHAJAHAN, VETTOOR LAKSHAM VEEDU COLONEY, KONNY THAZHAM VILLAGE, VETTOOR P.O, KONNY TALUK, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULUM. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused details and case reference. (Para 1) |
| 2. settlement led to request for proceeding quash. (Para 2) |
| 3. counsel confirmations about the dispute resolution. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. public prosecutor’s non-objection towards quashing. (Para 5) |
| 5. court's observations on settlement and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 2 to 6 in C.C.No.
1031/2018 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Pathanamthitta (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has arisen from Crime No. 3035/2017 registered by the Pathanamthitta Police Station, Pathanamthitta District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 323, 324 and 427 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4, who have executed Annexures 3 to 5 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
