Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
MUHAMMED SUHAIB, MOHAMMED FAYIZ K.T, MOHAMMED AFAL, ADNAN V.P, SANU SABITH K.C, AMAL SOORAJ V, MUKHTAR AHMED YASEEN O, FAHIM MOHAMED, HATHIM ABDULLA, MUHAMMED SIYAN, JASIM RUWAYB C.V, ASWIN KRISHNA P, MOHAMMED ADEEP, MUHAMMED NADISH, MOHAMED HASHIM, MUHAMMED MASIN K, ANSHAD SANU, MUHAMMED RHAMEEM ABDULLAH, HAFIN SHAN P.K, MUHAMAD MUSHIN M.K, ABDUL BASIL C, SIVADUTH K.R, ZAYAN IRFAN, AABID ABDUL LATHEEF K.P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
The petitioners are accused Nos. 1 to 24 in C.C.No.
26/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Thrissur (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has arisen from Crime No. 736/2024 registered by the Viyyoor Police Station, Thrissur District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 189 (2), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 118(1), and 118(2) read with Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 7, who have executed Annexures A2 to A7 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 7.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably. The party respondents hav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
