Devan Ramachandran,J.

We must begin conceding that, perhaps, this Court made a mistake while recording submissions and issuing directions in the judgment. Though this was inadvertent, we believe that it is enjoined on us to rectify it, lest the litigants be prejudiced.

2. We delivered judgment in OP(FC).No.194/2025, ordering the parties to continue the arrangement as we have earlier made in the interim order dated 11.04.2025. However, it was not pointed out to us by either of the Counsel that this order had been modified by a subsequent order dated 04.06.2025 - through which the child was allowed to be with the father. This is indubitable from the said order, where we directed the respondent herein to leave the child with the maternal grandparents on 07.06.2025, to be picked up on the same day at

4 P.M.

3. The afore lacuna, has now given rise to an unnecessary controversy, which obviously will traumatize the child.

4. The petitioner alleges that her parents are ordered by this Court to be in custody of the child; while the respondent takes a stand to the contrary.

5. As we have said above, perhaps the parties cannot be fully blamed because the judgment we delivered referred to the interi