IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
BHASKARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges the conviction under the abkari act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. inadequate evidence regarding sample collection and procedural adherence. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
The judgment dated 03.12.2012 of the Additional Sessions Court-II, Thodupuzha in Crl.A No.129/2012, upholding the conviction of the petitioner for the commission of offence under Section 8 (2) r/w (1) of the Abkari Act , is under challenge in this revision petition filed by the accused in that case.
2. The allegation against the petitioner was that he was found to have been in possession of 35 litres of arrack in a plastic jerry can of 35 litres capacity held by him while coming through a pathway in a tea plantation in Ayyappankovil Village. The Excise Inspector of Excise Range Office, Kattappana and his team are said to have detected the offence and arrested the petitioner on the spot. Sample of the contraband arrack is said to have been collected then and there. After the completion of the further proceedings of investigation, the Excise Inspector of Excise Range Office, Kattappana laid the final report alleging the commission of the aforesaid offence by the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.