IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
BIJUMON MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has made some deposits with the
4th respondent bank. According to the petitioner, though the deposits have matured, the amounts are not being paid to the petitioner despite requests.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the
4th respondent bank submits that the 4th respondent is in dire financial straits and is not in a position to pay off the entire amount due to the petitioner. It is submitted that the 4th respondent bank has initiated recovery proceedings against persons from whom money is owed to the bank, and once the financial condition of the 4th respondent bank improves, the bank will clear the liability to the petitioner.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent bank may be directed to pay off the amounts due to the petitioner in some instalments.
4. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent bank and considering the fact that the amount of deposits claimed by the petitioner is only a sum of Rs.6,02,144/-, I am of the opinion that the writ petition can be disposed of in the following manner.
i. The amounts payable to the petitioner in terms
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.