Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
MIDHUN SABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts leading to the bail application and charges against the accused. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the petitioner disputing involvement in the alleged crime. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the lack of specific overt act attributed to the petitioner. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal reasoning regarding anticipatory bail and relevant judicial precedents. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion and direction for bail conditions. (Para 12) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The petitioner is accused No.4 in Crime No.930/2025 of Thiruvalla Police Station, Pathanamthitta. The offences alleged against the petitioner and the other accused are punishable under Section s 126 (2), 296(b), 351(3), 118(1), 118(2) and 110 r/w Section
3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita ( BNS ), 2023.
3. The prosecution case as narrated in Annexure C order reads thus:-
“On 17.04.2025 at 05.30 PM, at place namely Chumathra, the petitioner along with the other accused persons had brutally attacked the defacto complainant using dangerous weapons, resulting grievous injuries to him.” [sic].
4. The case of the petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
