Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
DHANYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applications for anticipatory bail described. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both sides regarding involvement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observation and rationale for bail. (Para 7) |
| 4. conditions for bail and final ruling. (Para 8) |
COMMON ORDER
These are applications seeking anticipatory bail, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The petitioners are accused in various crimes registered by various police stations. The ranks of the petitioners, the crime numbers and the offences alleged against them are narrated below :-
| Bail Application No. | Crime No. And Police Station | Rank of the petitioners | Offences alleged |
| 12414 of 2025 | 919 of 2025 of Puthencruz Poice Station | A2, A4 and A6 (not named in FIR) | Sections 316(2) and 318(2) r/w Section 3(5) of BNS. |
| 12415 of 2025 | 1144 of 2025 of Kuruppampady Police Station | A3 and A4 | Section 420 r/w Section 34 of IPC. |
| 12419 of 2025 | 1194 of 2025 of Puthencruz Police Station | A2 and A4 | Sections 316(2) and 318(2) r/w Section 3(5) of BNS. |
| 12545 of 2025 | 1104 of 2025 of Irinjalakuda Police Station | A4, A5 and A7 | Section 318(4) r/w Section 3(5) of BNS. |
| 12546 of 2025 | 675 of 2025 of Chalakkudy Police Station | Not | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
