Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
APPUTTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail filed in court. (Para 1) |
| 2. facts of the case concerning the accused's charges and custody status. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments presented by the counsels regarding bail application. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court’s observations leading to the decision on bail. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (for short, ‘ BNSS ’).
2. The petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.125/2025 of the Parappanangadi Excise Range Office. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 55 (a) and 55(i) of the Abkari Act , 1077 (for short, ‘ ’).
3. The petitioner was arrested on 21.09.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation is practically over and the further detention of the petitioner is not required.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the petitioner.
7. Having regard to the nature of the allegations, stage of the investigation and the tenure of judicial custody undergone by the peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
