SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52063

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
ABDUL RISHAN. K.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Application No. 13811 of 2025 | Crime No. 810/2025 | CRMC No. 1612 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI. BEJOY JOSEPH P.J., SHRI. GOVIND G. NAIR, SRI.BALU TOM, SRI.BONNY BENNY
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The court dismissed the bail application as not pressed, following the petitioner's voluntary withdrawal.

Headnote:In this case, the court analyzed the application for bail under the provisions pertaining to criminal proceedings. The petitioner sought bail but subsequently chose not to press this application, leading the court to dismiss it as such. The primary issue considered was the voluntary action of the plaintiff regarding the bail application, with the court concluding that since the petitioner was not pursuing the request, the application for bail would consequently be dismissed. The court ultimately ruled that the bail application is dismissed as not pressed.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing the bail application.

Recording the above submission, the Bail Application is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top