Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J.
For the Respondents: SHRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY, SMT. DEVI SHRI R.

The court established that a writ petition becomes infructuous when the prayers for relief are no longer relevant.

Headnote:The case involves a writ petition where the petitioner has declared that the prayers have become infructuous. The court acknowledged the submission, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous. The primary issue framed was whether the prayers in the petition were relevant to continue. The court reasoned that the matter could not proceed due to the nature of the prayers. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :