MUSTHAFA @ AHAMMADKUTTY vs KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52071

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUSTHAFA @ AHAMMADKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL, SRI.P.ABDUL NISHAD, SHRI.ISTINAF ABDULLAH, SMT.THASNEEM A.P., SMT.SURYA S.R., SHRI.SUBRAHMANIAN T.
For the Respondents: SHRI.NIRMAL.S, SHRI.SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL, SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ, SMT.T.S.SREEKUTTY, SRI.B.PREMOD

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to challenge Ext.R7(a), the permit issued to the 7^th respondent. Permission is granted.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52071

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JMUSTHAFA @ AHAMMADKUTTY – AppellantVersusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUSTHAFA @ AHAMMADKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent