SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52071

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUSTHAFA @ AHAMMADKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15862 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL, SRI.P.ABDUL NISHAD, SHRI.ISTINAF ABDULLAH, SMT.THASNEEM A.P., SMT.SURYA S.R., SHRI.SUBRAHMANIAN T.
For the Respondents: SHRI.NIRMAL.S, SHRI.SAYED MANSOOR BAFAKHY THANGAL, SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ, SMT.T.S.SREEKUTTY, SRI.B.PREMOD

Withdrawal of a writ petition does not prejudice the right to challenge future actions related to the case.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition regarding a permit issued to the seventh respondent without prejudice to the right of future challenge. The court granted permission for withdrawal of the writ petition. This judgment addresses the procedural aspect of the petitioner's request and the court's authority in such matters. The outcome of the case is the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition without prejudice to his right to challenge Ext.R7(a), the permit issued to the 7th respondent. Permission is granted.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon