Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M/S. MANJOO & COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (KSRTC) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner sought refund of excess fees due to renovations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directed response to the petitioner's representation. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, a partnership firm, was engaged in the sale of lottery tickets at 50 different bus stations operated by the respondents from 2006 to 2017 on the basis of the license granted from time to time. Due to the renovation of the bus stations, some of the stalls were directed to be vacated.
2. The petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 seeking a refund of the excess license fee remitted by them. The said representation is pending consideration before the second respondent.
3. Under such circumstances, there will be a direction to the second respondent to hear the petitioner and pass orders on the same within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
