SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52076

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUHAMMED RIYAS M.K., BINESH, DHANYA MANJERI, SAJAD T.T., IBRAHIM SULFIKER.E. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN H., SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SMT.B.R.SINDU, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SMT.AFNA V.P., SRI.V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SRI. B. PREMOD, SMT. O.M. SHALINA

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that certain defects occurred in the filing of the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.

Without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition, this Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top