SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52076

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUHAMMED RIYAS M.K., BINESH, DHANYA MANJERI, SAJAD T.T., IBRAHIM SULFIKER.E. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43405 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.HARIHARAN, SRI.PRAVEEN H., SMT.K.S.SMITHA, SMT.B.R.SINDU, SRI.V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, SMT.AFNA V.P., SRI.V.ROHITH
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SRI. B. PREMOD, SMT. O.M. SHALINA

The withdrawal of a writ petition is permitted, allowing petitioners the option to refile, preserving their rights.

Headnote:The court examined the application for permission to withdraw a writ petition, acknowledging the possibility for the petitioners to refile in future. Consent was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the current petition as withdrawn. The decision emphasizes the rights of petitioners in relation to future filings.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that certain defects occurred in the filing of the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.

Without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to file a fresh writ petition, this Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon Instagram Icon Twitter Icon

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon