IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SURESH BABU T.M. – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF TOWN PLANNER (VIGILANCE) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. prayers for mandamus relating to construction (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. need for effective municipal response to applications (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
These two writ petitions are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these two cases by a common judgment.
2. The prayers in Writ Petition No.356/2021 is extracted hereunder:
“i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to take further action on Ext.P8 and to demolish the illegal construction of the 3rd respondent within the time frame by this Hon’ble Court.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P9 and pass orders thereon within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
iii) Issue such other appropriate writs, orders or directions as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
[SIC]
3. The prayers in WP(C) No.36317/2025 is also extracted hereunder:
“i. Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 2nd Respondent to regularize the constr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.