SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52081

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
T.SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.G.RAJAN POTAYIL, SMT.SUJA PADNABAN PILLAI, SMT.YAMUNA RANI V.G., SHRI.GOPIKRISHNA S.
For the Respondents: SRI.S.MOHAMMED AL RAFI, SHRI.ADIL.M.H

JUDGMENT

When this Writ Petition came up for consideration on

12.11.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner, and it was posted for hearing. Thereafter, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. I am of the considered opinion that this Writ Petition (C) need not be retained here.

Therefore, this Writ Petition (C) is dismissed for default.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top