IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
RABEEH P – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction to the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under Section 2(XVA) of the Act to consider and pass orders on Exhibit P-4 Form 5 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order, or direction to the 6th respondent to submit a report to the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under Section 2(XVA) of the Act within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii) Dispense with the filing of the translation of vernacular documents.
iv) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext. P4 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P4 application with
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.