SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52091

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
AISATH NUSEEBA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 43704 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.MAAROOF, SMT.NAFIYA SHAHALA C.K.

A petitioner may withdraw a writ petition leading to dismissal without adjudication on the merits.

Headnote:The court considered the request from the counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition (WP

(C) NO. 43704 OF 2025) owing to unspecified reasons, resulting in a dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The verdict indicates no further implications on the merits of the case due to its withdrawal.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this writ petition.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top