SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
KERALA FEEDS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PREM KOSHY PHILIP – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ABEL TOM BENNY, SRI.D.PREM KAMATH, SRI.TOM THOMAS (KAKKUZHIYIL), SHRI.AARON ZACHARIAS BENNY, SMT.TESSA ROSE, SHRI.CLINT JUDE LEWIS, SHRI.MATHEW ANGELO DAVIS, SMT.ANANDITHA RAJEEV
For the Respondents: SRI.K.M.JAMALUDHEEN, SMT.S.L.SYLAJA, GOVT.PLEADER

ORDER

The counsel for the review petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the review petition.

Permission granted and the review petition is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the rights.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top