SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52104

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
SAIDALIKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH, SRI. HARIKIRAN M., SHRI.PRAVEENKUMAR P., SRI.A.ABDUL RAHMAN (A-1917), SMT.ROSHINI UDAYAKUMAR, SMT.AKHILA SRIDHARAN, SMT.STEPHY GRACE RAJ
For the Respondents: GP- NIMMY JOHNSON

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 20th day of November, 2025 Petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the

3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application in Form No.6 which is stated to be pending consideration before the 3rd respondent.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner asserts that Ext.P2 application is still pending consideration.

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, and after hearing the contentions on both sides, I am inclined to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 3rd respondent/competent authority to take up and pass orders on Ext.P2 application in accordance with law without any delay, at any rate within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, if Ext.P2 application is received and pending.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top