JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P7.

2. Petitioner’s land was acquired by the 1^st respondent for the 5^th respondent and the compensation was paid as per the award passed under Section 11 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as “Act 1894”). Petitioner accepted the award on a specific condition that she is eligible to enhanced compensation if any paid to any other similar land covered by the same notification under Section 4(1) of the Act 1894. Later the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Thiruvananthapuram awarded compensation at higher rates in respect of some other lands covered by the same notification under Section 4(1) of the Act, 1894. Petitioner relying on Ext.P2 judgment of the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Authority, Thiruvananthapuram made a claim as per Ext.P3 application which was rejected by the 4^th respondent as per Ext.P4 and the same was challenged before this Court filing W.P.(C) No.22050 of 2024. This Court allowed the writ petition as per Ext.P5 judgment dated 24.02.2025 and directed the 4^th respondent to reconsider the application submitted by the petitioner under Sec