IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
PRAKASHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is submitted by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:
“i. To issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to quash Ext P1 notification;
ii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P2 representation and issue orders safeguarding the interest of the petitioners.
iii. Dispense with the translation of vernacular documents;
iv. To grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
The petitioners are lorry drivers transporting goods from Beverages Corporation Warehouse in Chalakkudy to other beverage outlets. The petitioners’ grievance is against the issuance of Ext.P1 tender notification inviting bids for sale and delivery of the goods of the Beverages Corporation to various warehouses. According to the petitioners, the petitioners have been engaged as drivers for the past several years and in such circumstances, highlighting their grievances, the 1st petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent. The limited relief sought by the petitioners is to direct
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.