SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52109

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
PRAKASHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.SUJIN
For the Respondents: NAVEEN T.

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is submitted by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:

“i. To issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction to quash Ext P1 notification;

ii. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P2 representation and issue orders safeguarding the interest of the petitioners.

iii. Dispense with the translation of vernacular documents;

iv. To grant such other reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

The petitioners are lorry drivers transporting goods from Beverages Corporation Warehouse in Chalakkudy to other beverage outlets. The petitioners’ grievance is against the issuance of Ext.P1 tender notification inviting bids for sale and delivery of the goods of the Beverages Corporation to various warehouses. According to the petitioners, the petitioners have been engaged as drivers for the past several years and in such circumstances, highlighting their grievances, the 1st petitioner has submitted Ext.P2 representation before the 2nd respondent. The limited relief sought by the petitioners is to direct

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top