SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52116

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
SUNIL PUTHAN VEETTIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 787 OF 2025 | CC NO.996 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ARUN SAMUEL, SRI.JITHIN BABU A, SHRI.ANOOD JALAL K.J.
For the Respondents: SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP

A petition can be withdrawn with permission from the court, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:The petitioners sought to withdraw OP(CRL.) No. 787 of 2025, originally filed before the High Court of Kerala pertaining to CC No. 996 of 2021. The Court permitted the withdrawal of the petition and dismissed it as such, stating the matter concluded with no further action required.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the Original Petition (Crl.). Accordingly, this Original Petition (Crl.) is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top