SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52122

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMEDALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA, SMT.ANUPAMA JOHNY, SMT.K.S.SUDHA
For the Respondents: SRI.K.P.PRASANTH, SRI.VISHNU DILEEP, SMT.T.S.KRISHNENDU, SMT.ARCHANA SURESH, SMT.SHEHALLA M. BASHEER, SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP, SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR, SMT.V.SHYLAJA, SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP, SRI.E.C.BINEESH, SR.PP

J U D G M E N T

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that these writ petitions are not pressed.

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top