SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52122

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
MUHAMMEDALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8071 OF 2019 | WP(C) NO. 8101 OF 2019 | WP(C) NO. 8116 OF 2019 | WP(C) NO. 8122 OF 2019 | WP(C) NO. 8125 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.C.SANTHOSHKUMAR, SMT.K.K.CHANDRALEKHA, SMT.ANUPAMA JOHNY, SMT.K.S.SUDHA
For the Respondents: SRI.K.P.PRASANTH, SRI.VISHNU DILEEP, SMT.T.S.KRISHNENDU, SMT.ARCHANA SURESH, SMT.SHEHALLA M. BASHEER, SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP, SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR, SMT.V.SHYLAJA, SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP, SRI.E.C.BINEESH, SR.PP

The dismissal of writ petitions when they are not pressed by the petitioner is upheld.

Headnote:This judgement concerns writ petitions WP

(C) NO. 8071 OF 2019, WP

(C) NO. 8101 OF 2019, and others. The court found that the petitions were not pressed, leading to their dismissal. The main issue centered on the lack of pressing need for the writ petitions. Ultimately, the writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.

J U D G M E N T

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that these writ petitions are not pressed.

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top