SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52125

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
GOPAKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MUHAMMED ISMAIL – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28970 OF 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RANJIT, SRI.GOKUL DAS V.V.H., SRI.E.C.BINEESH

A writ petition is dismissed as infructuous when the underlying issue has been resolved with the conclusion of the investigation and filing of a final report.

Headnote:The prayer in the writ petition seeks a direction for a proper investigation regarding Crime No.1630 of 2018 of Chingavanam Police Station. However, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor confirms that the investigation is concluded, and a final report has been filed with the Magistrate Court taking cognizance as C.C.No.717 of 2020. The court finds that the prayer has become infructuous and dismisses the writ petition as such.

J U D G M E N T

The prayer in this writ petition is to give a direction to the respondent No.4 to conduct a proper investigation in Crime No.1630 of 2018 of Chingavanam Police Station, Kottayam. Sri.E.C.Bineesh, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor on instructions submits that the investigation is over, final report has already been filed and the Magistrate Court has taken cognizance as C.C.No.717 of 2020. Hence, the prayer has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top