SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52140

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
FAB WOOD AND PLY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.E.C.AHAMED FAZIL, SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.C.A.NAVAS, SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY, SRI.JAVED HAIDER, SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the subject matter of this writ petition has become infructous.

The said submission is recorded. This writ petition will stand dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top