IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
HRIDAYARAJ – Appellant
Versus
PRINCY – Respondent
O R D E R Dated this the 19th day of November, 2025 Petitioner in Crl.M.P. No.4133/2024 in unnumbered Criminal Appeal of 2024, pending before the Sessions Court, Palakkad, filed this Crl.M.C. challenging Annexure-A2 order directing him to deposit 50% of the arrears of maintenance as a condition for condoning the delay of 143 days in filing the above appeal.
2. Petitioner filed the above appeal against the order of the learned Magistrate directing the petitioner to pay interim maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,000/- per month to his wife and Rs.2,500/- per month to the minor child.
3. Though the matter was referred for mediation, it was not fruitful.
In this case, the marriage and the paternity of the child are admitted. The rate of interim maintenance awarded by the learned Magistrate @Rs.3,000/- and Rs.2,500/- each per month cannot be termed as excessive or exorbitant. In the above circumstances, the direction of the learned Sessions Judge to deposit 50% of the arrears of interim maintenance till date cannot be held to be irrational or improper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4. Now, the learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the arrears till date will come to mor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.