Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SUBAIDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1563 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.RAKESH
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA

The dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case as not pressed reflects procedural adherence and party autonomy in legal proceedings.

Headnote:The judgment concerns Crl. M.C. No. 1563 of 2021, where the petitioner requested the dismissal of the application. The court recorded the petitioner's submission and dismissed the Crl. M.C. as not pressed. The court's conclusion was straightforward, shown in the order's final statement of dismissal.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as not pressed.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE mtk/19.11.25 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 1563/2021 PETITIONER ANNEXURES ANNEXURE A TRUE COPY OF THE CRIME AND OCCURRENCE REPORT IN CRIME NO. 8/2021 OF THE EXCISE RANGE, PALAKKAD DATED 2.2.2021.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52167

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.S.DIAS, JSUBAIDA – AppellantVersusTHE STATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 1563 OF 2021

The dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case as not pressed reflects procedural adherence and party autonomy in legal proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SUBAIDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 1563 OF 2021