SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52169

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ANTONY ASBEN @ M.A.ANTONY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.UNNIKRISHNAN (KOLLAM), SMT.UTHARA A.S, SHRI.GAJENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHIT
For the Respondents: SR.PP.SMT.SEETHA S

ORDER

Dated this the 19th day of November, 2025 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that as the defacto complainant is no more, the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the Crl.M.C without prejudice to their right to work out their remedies in accordance with law.

In light of the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn, but by reserving the right of the petitioners to work out their remedies in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top