SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52171

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
KIRAN G. NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 2087 OF 2022 | CRIME NO.425/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.KRISHNAKUMAR, SRI.P.V.THOMAS, SMT.LEENU ANANDHAN
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.ARUN CHANDRAN, SHRI.HARIMOHAN PP, SRI.M.P.PRSANTH

The dismissal of a criminal case due to the death of the petitioner constitutes an abatement.

Headnote:Section 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure outlines the procedure for filing a Criminal Miscellaneous Case. The petitioner in this case sought relief under CRL.MC NO. 2087 OF 2022, related to CRIME NO. 425/2021. The court noted the abatement due to the petitioner’s death and determined to dismiss the case accordingly. The primary issue framed by the court was whether the case should continue post the petitioner’s demise. The court reasoned that in light of the circumstances, further proceedings are unwarranted, thus leading to the dismissal of the Crl. M.C. As a result, the court dismissed the Crl. M.C as abated, reflecting the procedural propriety in such circumstances.

O R D E R Dated this the 19th day of November 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as abated, since the petitioner is no more.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as abated.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top