SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52171

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
KIRAN G. NATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.J.KRISHNAKUMAR, SRI.P.V.THOMAS, SMT.LEENU ANANDHAN
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI.ARUN CHANDRAN, SHRI.HARIMOHAN PP, SRI.M.P.PRSANTH

O R D E R Dated this the 19th day of November 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as abated, since the petitioner is no more.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as abated.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top