Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.A.MUJEED
For the Respondents: Senior Public Prosecutor SMT.SEETHA S

Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous case as infructuous based on the petitioners' counsel's submission.

Headnote:This case concerns the dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case as infructuous, with petitioners arguing for such dismissal. The court, upon recording the petitioners' counsel's submission, concluded that no further action was needed, resulting in the dismissal of the Crl. M.C. as infructuous. The outcome reflects the court's acceptance of the counsel's arguments and efficiently resolves the matter at hand.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as infructuous.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :