Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AMEEN SHAH M.B. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5788 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN, SRI.V.VINAY, SRI.M.S.ANEER
For the Respondents: ADDL.DIRECTOR GENERAL OF PROSECUTION SR.PP. SMT. SEETHA S.

The court permits withdrawal of Crl.M.C, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies legally.

Headnote:The court addressed the submission of the petitioner to dismiss the Crl.M.C as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to pursue remedies as per the law. The dismissal was recorded following the petitioner's counsel's request. The application was resolved without prejudice to any further rights or remedies that may be available to the petitioner. Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.

O R D E R Dated this the 19^th day of November 2025 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Crl.M.C may be dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to workout his remedies in accordance with law.

Recording the above submission, the Crl.M.C is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52190

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMC.S.DIAS, JAMEEN SHAH M.B. – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 5788 OF 2021

The court permits withdrawal of Crl.M.C, allowing the petitioner to pursue further remedies legally.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
AMEEN SHAH M.B. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5788 OF 2021