Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
ANANDA KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of offences and amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. no objection to proceedings being quashed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. inherent powers to quash based on prior judicial rulings. (Para 6) |
| 4. justification for exercising jurisdiction and promoting harmony. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioners are accused Nos. 2 and 3 in Crime No. 216/2025 registered by the Hill Palace Police Station, Ernakulam District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 115(2), 118(1) 117(2) and 110 read with Section 3 (5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4, who have executed Annexures A2 to A4 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 4.
4. The learned counsel on either side subm
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
