IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
USHA SREEDHARA MENON – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to quash proceedings based on a settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsels confirm amicable resolution and lack of objections. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court recognizes its power to quash based on settlement. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
The petitioner is the fourth accused in Crime No.
167/2014 registered by the Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120B, 406 and 420 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the second respondent, who has executed Annexure A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the second respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their dispu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.