Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
PUTHAN PURAYIL HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations against the petitioner involved unlawful assembly and grievous hurt. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding absence of specific accusations against the petitioner. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's rationale for considering anticipatory bail based on accusations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. order allowing bail with specific conditions outlined. (Para 12) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ), 2023.
2. The petitioner is accused No.9 in Crime No.885/2025 of Kuttiyadi Police Station. The offences alleged against the petitioner are punishable under Sections 189 (2), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2), 110 r/w Section 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. The prosecution case, as narrated in Annexure-A3 order reads thus:
“Petitioner along with other 10 accused persons and 15 other persons have on 11.09.2025 at 09.30 p.m. formed themselves into an unlawful assembly, armed with deadly weapons and attacked the defacto complainant. The further case is that the victim was attacked by wooden rafters and iron rod. 1st accused has bet on the head of the victim with the iron rod, which was su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
