SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52224

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
RAGESH K V AGED 36 YEARS S/O LEELA KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.RAJEEV, SRI.V.VINAY, SRI.M.S.ANEER, SHRI.ANILKUMAR C.R., SHRI.SARATH K.P., SHRI.K.S.KIRAN KRISHNAN, SMT.DIPA V., SHRI.AKASH CHERIAN THOMAS, SHRI.AZAD SUNIL, SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN, SHRI.T.P.ARAVIND, SHRI.MAHESWAR P., SMT.AKSHARA S.
For the Respondents: ADV. SREEJA V., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

JUDGMENT

In view of certain errors that have crept in the appeal memorandum, the learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal.

2. Considering the above circumstances, reserving the aforesaid liberty, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

The Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned judgment to the counsel for the appellants after it is replaced with a photocopy.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top