Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
VIPIN DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court invoked inherent powers to quash proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties reached an amicable settlement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. continuation of prosecution is unnecessary and unproductive. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are accused in C.C.No. 515/2025 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Chengannur, (‘Trial Court’, for short), which has arisen from Crime No. 446/2025 registered by the Chengannur Police Station, Alappuzha District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 126 (2), 296(b) and 115(2) read with Section
3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 , to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the respondents 2 to 4, who have executed Annexures A3 to A5 affidavits, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the responden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
