Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
GEORGE KUTTY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (GENERAL) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basis of loan taken by the petitioner leading to default. (Para 1) |
| 2. financial arguments and constraints presented by both sides. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court's observation on providing installment repayment opportunity. (Para 4) |
| 4. final directions regarding repayment plan. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner availed a mortgage loan from the respondent bank. On default being committed, proceedings were initiated against the petitioner under the provisions of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act , 1969, prompting the petitioner to approach this court by filing the above writ petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to clear the entire liability in installments.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the outstanding amount due from the petitioner as on 18.11.2025 is Rs.14,35,700/-. It is submitted that some reasonable installments can be given to the petitioner to clear the entire liability. It is submitted that there are several writ petitions pending before this court filed by depositors stating that their deposits are not being returned by the bank. It is submitted that the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
