Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52257

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SIBY K. THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 35552 of 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.NARENDRA KUMAR, SMT.HARSHADEV M.
For the Respondents: GP, SRI. K. JANARDHANA SHENOY, SHRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)

The court can dismiss a writ petition when the petitioner is not pursuing the case.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Writ Petition (Civil) No. 35552 of 2024 regarding the dismissal of a writ petition as not pressed. The petitioner did not pursue the matter hence the court recorded and dismissed it without further deliberation. The essence resides in the procedural determination of non-pursuance by the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

When this Writ Petition(C) came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is not pressing the petition.

The same is recorded.

Therefore, this Writ Petition(C) is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52257

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JSIBY K. THOMAS – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWrit Petition (Civil) No. 35552 of 2024

The court can dismiss a writ petition when the petitioner is not pursuing the case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SIBY K. THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 35552 of 2024