IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PARAMAESWARAN N.V – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent or any other officer concerned to consider and dispose of Ext-P2 application pending before him, within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
(ii) To dispense with the production of English Translation of documents which are in vernacular language.
(iii) Such other relief’s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to grant in the nature of this case” [SIC]
2. The main prayer in this Writ Petition is to consider Ext.P2 Form-6 application filed by the petitioner under Section 27A read with Rule 12(1) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act and Rules, 2008 ('Act and Rules' in short).
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P2 within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition(C) is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on Ext.P2 Form-6 application to the 2nd respondent / Authorised Officer within a period of one month fro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.