SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52270

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
THE SECRETARY, MANNARMALA JUMA MASJID PERINTHALMANNA THALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT REPRESENTING MANNARMALA JUMA MASJID – Appellant
Versus
THE VATTATHOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 15712 OF 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.C.A.NAVAS, SRI.T.K.SASIKUMAR, SRI.P.A.SHAJI SAMAD
For the Respondents: SHRI.ZAKEER HUSSAIN, SRI.K.MOHANAKANNAN, SRI.NAVANEETH D.PAI, SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA, SHRI.MOHAMMED ZAMAN

The court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.

Headnote:This judgment relates to a writ petition where the petitioner sought to withdraw the application. The court permitted this withdrawal, which resulted in the dismissal of the petition. The court's findings are succinctly stated as the dismissal of the writ petition. The main issue framed by the court was regarding the permission to withdraw the petition. The ratio decidendi is based on the proper procedural requirements being satisfied for withdrawal, resulting in a dismissal on that basis. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 21st day of November, 2025 The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Accordingly the above writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top