Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52272

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
BALAMURALI KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2358 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.K.MADHUSOODANAN, SHRI.P.M.BINOY KRISHNA
For the Respondents: SHRI.DEEPU THANKAN, SC, KSRTC

The court upheld the right of a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition without prejudice to future claims.

Headnote:The court analyzed the withdrawal of WP

(C) No. 2358 of 2025 filed by the appellant, confirming that the petition was dismissed as withdrawn due to the request of the appellant's counsel. Key considerations included the procedural propriety of withdrawal and the implications thereof. The court clarified that such dismissals do not impact the merits of the case. The petition, accordingly, is dismissed as withdrawn.

J U D G M E N T

When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw this writ petition.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52272

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., JBALAMURALI KRISHNAN – AppellantVersusKERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – RespondentWP(C) NO. 2358 OF 2025

The court upheld the right of a petitioner to withdraw a writ petition without prejudice to future claims.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
BALAMURALI KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2358 OF 2025