SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52273

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A., J
CHATTANCHAL ENGINEERING COMPANY – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE RURAL ROADS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN, SHRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL
For the Respondents: GOVERNMENT PLEADER

J U D G M E N T

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top