SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 52279

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NASEEF PULLAT – Appellant
Versus
SHAMSHEENA T.P. – Respondent
OP(CRL.) NO. 789 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: C.R.SIVAKUMAR, P.HARIKUMAR
For the Respondents: BINI KRISHNA, ANJALI C., SUBHAJA P., ARDHRA KRISHNA, NISHA MATHEW, VIPIN KUMAR K.P.

Maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. applies to divorced Muslim women till obligations under the Muslim Women Act are fulfilled.

Headnote:The Original Petition challenges the Family Court's interim maintenance order under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The court finds that maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. remains enforceable despite a pending divorce case. The petitioner’s maintenance obligations continue, leading to the dismissal of the original petition.

Table of Content
1. challenge to interim maintenance order (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

This Original Petition has been filed challenging the order passed by the Family Court, Malappuram granting interim maintenance.

2. The petitioner was the husband of the 1st respondent and is the father of the 2nd respondent. The respondents filed a maintenance case as M.C.No.5 of 2024 before the Family Court, Malappuram, against the petitioner claiming maintenance. They have also filed an application for interim maintenance as C.M.P.No.3/2024. The Family Court granted interim monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.3,500/- to the 1st respondent and Rs.1,500/- to the 2nd respondent from the date of the petition. The said order is under challenge in this original petition.

3. Heard both sides.

4. Admittedly, the marriage between the petitioner and the

1st respondent is dissolved. The 1st respondent has filed a petition as M.C.No.926 of 2023 under Section 3 of the the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 (for short, 'the Act, 1986') before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Manjeri, as evident from Ext.P3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the 1st respondent is a divorced Muslim woman and has already invoked of the Act, 1986, the claim for maintenance is not maintainable. I cannot subscribe to the said submission. It is settled that an application for maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C by a divorced Muslim woman is maintainable and the husband's obligation to pay the maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. continues till he discharges his obligation under of the Act, 1986. Admittedly, the said application is still pending.

5. The petitioner is employed at Gulf. Hence, the quantum of monthly interim maintenance granted by the Family Court appears to be very reasonable. I see no illegality or impropriety in the impugned order.

Accordingly, the original petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top