Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SHARATH CHANDRAN P.C. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused seek to quash the fir after amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties resolved disputes, leading to state's consent to quash. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court highlights its powers for quashing based on settlements. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The petitioners are the accused No. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 735/2025 registered by the Pudukkadu Police Station, Thrissur District, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 281 and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the third respondent, who has executed Annexure 2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned counsel for the third respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that, with the intervention of relatives and well-wishers, the parties have resolved their disputes
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
