Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
DEVAPRASAD @ PANAN – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL M.V – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the need for restoration of partition suits. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the court's directive for expedited procedures. (Para 2) |
| 3. final ruling for timely disposal by the trial court. (Para 5) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 20 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 / 29TH KARTHIKA, 1947 OP(C) NO. 2932 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OS NO.250 OF 2021 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD PETITIONER/S:
DEVAPRASAD @ PANAN AGED 67 YEARS S/O LATE VASUDEVAN, MELAPPURA VEEDU, KADAKURISSI, KANNADI P.O., PALAKKAD, PIN - 678701 BY ADVS.
SRI.BINOY VASUDEVAN SRI.SREEJITH SREENATH SMT.RINCY KHADER SMT.K.V.RAJESWARI RESPONDENT/S:
PRABHALA CHANDRIKA W/O LATE SUKUMARAN, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, NIRANJANA HOUSE, - 678001 KOPPAM NEAR LION’S SCHOOL, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.11.2025, ALONG WITH OP(C).2915/2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT OP(C) Nos.2915 & 2932/2025, both petitions are filed for issuing direction to the Additional Munsiff Court, Palakkad for speedy disposal of the interlocutory applications filed by the petitioner for restoration of RP
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
